| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
| Date: | 2014-11-12 05:32:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS6xsBQSwY_++Zse00q_2uxfEHVwrSJ1YarVawo-u6-8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The more important thing here is that I see little chance of this
> getting in before Heikki's larger rework of the wal format gets
> in. Since that'll change everything around anyay I'm unsure how much
> point there is to iterate till that's done. I know that sucks, but I
> don't see much of an alternative.
True enough. Hopefully the next patch changing WAL format will put in
all the infrastructure around backup blocks, so we won't have any need
to worry about major conflicts for this release cycle after it.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2014-11-12 06:43:09 | Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-11-12 00:54:21 | Re: using custom scan nodes to prototype parallel sequential scan |