Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
Date: 2015-02-13 08:09:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS+Xpz_8Ez8Wi+nDk-oHwwquhLGmd_y=Pm3z1X162XB4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> * There was some squashing of commits, since Andres felt that they
> weren't all useful as separate commits. I've still split out the RTE
> permissions commit, as well as the RLS commit (plus the documentation
> and test commits, FWIW). I hope that this will make it easier to
> review parts of the patch, without being generally excessive.
>
> When documentation and tests are left out, the entire patch series is left
> at:
>

Patch moved to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 08:10:10 Re: pg_rewind in contrib
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 08:07:39 Re: SSL information view