Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:34 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 22 March 2015 at 22:22, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On March 22, 2015 6:17:28 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> >>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm
>> >thinks.
>> >>
>> >> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.
>> >
>> >All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
>> >is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
>>
>> That's due to a different patch though, right?
>
>
> Yes this is due to cc0d90b.

Err, yes. This exp error is caused by the to_char patch (and that's
what I meant X)), bad copy-paste from here...
--
Michael