Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9 December 2014 at 12:21, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> OK. Perhaps that's not worth mentioning in the release notes, but some
> >> users may be used to the old behavior. What about the other issues
> >> (regression test for permissions incorrect and matviews)?
> > Here is in any case an updated patch to fix all those things rebased
> > on latest HEAD (ae4e688).
> > Thanks,
>
> I rewrote and applied this patch to ensure we didn't introduce further
> bugs.
>
> Tests for the reindex part were rewritten from scratch also.
>
> Rather unluckily that seems to have coincided with Tom's changes, so
> I've only added the bits that have nothing to do with Tom's changes -
> all of which stand.
>

Glad that things are in order now. I have nothing else left to complain
about with this feature. Thanks.

(I just got going again after my flight back from Tokyo).
>
I understand going east makes one day longer :)
--
Michael