Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Piotr Stefaniak <email(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>, "obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com" <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Date: 2017-11-29 02:24:07
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRn4NUrQfcbM0GjRBH6kYL0DV8gvFh=eZRKFcL-zPw-3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Nikita Glukhov
<n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Attached the new version of the patches where displaying of SQL/JSON
> constructor nodes was fixed. I decided not to invent new nodes but to
> extend
> existing FuncExpr, Aggref, WindowFunc nodes with new formatting fields that
> give us ability to override default displaying in ruleutils.c. Also new
> invisible CoercionForm was added for hiding casts in which FORMAT and
> RETUNING
> clauses are transformed.

Okay, I can see that the patch is still in the same situation two
weeks after I looked at it first, so I am marking it as returned with
feedback. This needs to be broken down, and get documentation. At this
point getting a review out of this patch is not something I'd
recommend until it is put in a shape that makes it easier. Please also
help in reviewing other's patches, yours here is very large.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 02:27:13 Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw: support parameterized foreign joins
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-11-29 02:24:00 Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows