Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-02-10 06:22:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRk4ZjoQfs4rmF6Di1zp=b4eA=hk0L4GFzUj47GwhgM7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> I am personally fine with () and [] as you mention, we could even consider
> {}, each one of them has a different meaning mathematically..
>
> I am not entered into a detailed review yet (waiting for the docs), but the
> patch looks brittle. I have been able to crash the server just by querying
> pg_stat_replication:
> * thread #1: tid = 0x0000, 0x0000000105eb36c2
> postgres`pg_stat_get_wal_senders(fcinfo=0x00007fff5a156290) + 498 at
> walsender.c:2783, stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
> * frame #0: 0x0000000105eb36c2
> postgres`pg_stat_get_wal_senders(fcinfo=0x00007fff5a156290) + 498 at
> walsender.c:2783
> frame #1: 0x0000000105d4277d
> postgres`ExecMakeTableFunctionResult(funcexpr=0x00007fea128f3838,
> econtext=0x00007fea128f1b58, argContext=0x00007fea128c8ea8,
> expectedDesc=0x00007fea128f4710, randomAccess='\0') + 1005 at
> execQual.c:2211
> frame #2: 0x0000000105d70c24
> postgres`FunctionNext(node=0x00007fea128f2f78) + 180 at
> nodeFunctionscan.c:95
> * thread #1: tid = 0x0000, 0x0000000105eb36c2
> postgres`pg_stat_get_wal_senders(fcinfo=0x00007fff5a156290) + 498 at
> walsender.c:2783, stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
> frame #0: 0x0000000105eb36c2
> postgres`pg_stat_get_wal_senders(fcinfo=0x00007fff5a156290) + 498 at
> walsender.c:2783
> 2780 /*
> 2781 * Get the currently active synchronous standby.
> 2782 */
> -> 2783 sync_standbys = (int *) palloc(sizeof(int) *
> SyncRepStandbyNames->wait_num);
> 2784 LWLockAcquire(SyncRepLock, LW_SHARED);
> 2785 num_sync =
> SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority(SyncRepStandbyNames, sync_standbys);
> 2786 LWLockRelease(SyncRepLock);
> (lldb) p SyncRepStandbyNames
> (SyncGroupNode *) $0 = 0x0000000000000000
>
> +sync_node_group:
> + sync_list { $$ = create_group_node(1, $1);
> }
> + | sync_element_ast { $$ = create_group_node(1,
> $1);}
> + | INT '[' sync_list ']' { $$ = create_group_node($1,
> $3);}
> + | INT '[' sync_element_ast ']' { $$ = create_group_node($1,
> $3); }
> We may want to be careful with the use of '[' in application_name. I am not
> much thrilled with forbidding the use of []() in application_name, so we may
> want to recommend user to use a backslash when using s_s_names when a group
> is defined.
>
> +void
> +yyerror(const char *message)
> +{
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> + errmsg_internal("%s", message)));
> +}
> whitespace errors here.

+#define MAX_WALSENDER_NAME 8192
+
typedef enum WalSndState
{
WALSNDSTATE_STARTUP = 0,
@@ -62,6 +64,11 @@ typedef struct WalSnd
* SyncRepLock.
*/
int sync_standby_priority;
+
+ /*
+ * Corresponding standby's application_name.
+ */
+ const char name[MAX_WALSENDER_NAME];
} WalSnd;
NAMEDATALEN instead?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-02-10 06:25:01 Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-10 06:13:53 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2