Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date: 2016-11-14 09:07:09
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRjhAg4HxX-NhCNv9b16Uhx1pxxzNwU=q2RLSOZK6Heuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
>
> Looks good, except that you left the "N" option in the getopt_long
> call for pg_dumpall. I fixed that in the attached patch.

No, v5 has removed it, but it does not matter much now...

> I'll mark the patch "ready for committer".

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-11-14 09:10:00 Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2016-11-14 09:04:43 Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability