From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |
Date: | 2016-10-18 01:12:51 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRfunvtNLJwR86VRij7Ts8BX_-Ta8=LOiQOpyM53DTo8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> We had several good backups since the previous outage so it's not
>> clear the events are related but after months of smooth operation I
>> find that coincidence highly suspicious. As always, we need to suspect
>> hardware problems but I'm highly abstracted from them -- using esx +
>> san.
>
> Ah, so you're subject not only to hardware flaws but also to
> virtualization layer bugs :-)
Wait a couple of more years, and we'll get more complains about
Postgres running in containers running in VMs. Even more fun waiting
ahead.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-10-18 01:30:51 | Re: asynchronous execution |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-17 23:38:45 | Re: postgres_fdw super user checks |