Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 4/7/15 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I tried to mark the "UPDATE SET (*)" patch as "returned with feedback",
>>> but the CF app informed me that if I did that the patch would
>>> automatically be moved to the next commitfest. That seems completely
>>> stupid. There is no need to reconsider it unless a new version of the
>>> patch is forthcoming (which there may or may not ever be, but that's
>>> beside the point for now). When and if the author does submit a new
>>> patch, that would be the time to include it in the next commitfest, no?
>>
>> I noticed that as well and have avoided closing some patches because of it.
>
> Several people, including me, have complained about this before. I
> hope that Magnus will fix it soon.

Yeah, you can find references about that here and there... And the
current behavior is confusing.
--
Michael