Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
Date: 2016-11-19 04:35:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRa=igQMCx+FxbfwJ0TzhLU2tE+YOng7qAvZ+1NPm-FOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, I have done some performance tests with this patch and found that it doesn't have any noticeable impact which is good. Details of performance tests is below:
> Machine configuration:
> 2 sockets, 28 cores (56 including Hyper-Threading)
> RAM = 64GB
> Data directory is configured on the magnetic disk and WAL on SSD.

Nice spec!

> The conclusion from my tests is that this patch is okay as far as performance is concerned.

Thank you a lot for doing those additional tests!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-19 05:16:00 Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-19 04:25:46 Re: patch: function xmltable