| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? |
| Date: | 2016-04-25 03:26:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRZVaO8fmeOcfWfXCTH45ooHQN79r8hX-KgptgvVs1c_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I took a second look at the above-quoted Microsoft documentation, and
> noticed that it specifies that this error occurs when another application
> is *bound* to the target address. If by that they mean that the other
> app did a bind(), then indeed what we're seeing here is a conflict with
> a listening app, so that the proposed patch would detect it. So I went
> ahead and pushed the patch --- in any case, it shouldn't make things
> any worse.
Not worse, and still not enough... bowerbird complained again:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2016-04-25%2002%3A13%3A54
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-25 03:31:22 | Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-25 03:01:42 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |