Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)
Date: 2017-05-26 12:24:29
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRXyU97tKYna7Y11U9dTrtTUheX3-XQeavxDtcQK9wU+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the real question here is, shall we backpatch this fix or we
> want to do this just in Head or we want to consider it as a new
> feature for PostgreSQL-11. I think it should be fixed in Head and the
> change seems harmless to me, so we should even backpatch it.

The thing is not invasive, so backpatching is a low-risk move. We can
as well get that into HEAD first, wait a bit for dust to settle on it,
and then backpatch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2017-05-26 12:36:38 Bug when dumping "empty" operator classes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-26 12:20:45 Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)