Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2016-09-03 13:26:21
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRX5Dv10BzBu-PuOW5YKZ7eGUDKnz_sdC5OLQoYOXB9=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 13 April 2016 at 15:31, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
>> Fixed patch attached. There already was infrastructure to skip currently
>> held locks during replay of standby_redo() and I’ve extended that with check for
>> prepared xids.
>
> Please confirm that everything still works on current HEAD for the new
> CF, so review can start.

The patch does not apply cleanly. Stas, could you rebase? I am
switching the patch to "waiting on author" for now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-09-03 13:26:35 Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-03 13:23:26 Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)