| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Date: | 2016-10-27 08:08:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRTq_ArCNRsG+cPZn4j00_ZMVy0DPwDaVj79++Bf03KYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seeing nothing happening, I have moved the patch to next CF as there
> is a new version, but no reviews for it.
Just a note for anybody potentially looking at this patch. I am
currently looking at it in depth, and will post a new version of the
patch in a couple of days with review comments. Thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-10-27 09:05:04 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
| Previous Message | Ants Aasma | 2016-10-27 07:31:18 | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |