| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PgQ and pg_dump |
| Date: | 2016-06-15 08:00:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRPZ41VA79GXXChZruhpWCtB-7ZMOYSz9cyu=StssMPtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Martin wrote:
> I wonder if this is the desirable way of handling pgq, or if those
> tables should be dumped. I'm starting to think that this is a PgQ bug,
> or maybe it's not a good idea to install PgQ as an extension.
As I am looking at that I would qualify that as a bug in pg_dump.
Schemas can be part of the extension definition and be linked to it,
and tables created on top of the schema defined in the extension
should really be dumped..
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martín Marqués | 2016-06-15 10:19:49 | Re: PgQ and pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2016-06-15 07:31:33 | Re: Changelog version from 8.1.2 to 9.3.6 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-06-15 09:23:39 | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-06-15 07:52:13 | Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails |