| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump |
| Date: | 2015-08-03 02:15:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRM73BE7ou84BZ0OWU6r9uwHzXbhjXxhTwoBgpe54y50Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Note as well that I will be fine with any decision taken by the
> committer who picks up this, this test case is useful by itself in any
> case.
And I just recalled that I actually did no tests for this thing on
Windows. As this uses the TAP facility, I think that it makes most
sense to run it with tapcheck instead of modulescheck in vcregress.pl
because of its dependency with IPC::Run. The compilation with MSVC is
fixed as well.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-TAP-test-for-pg_dump-checking-data-dump-of-exten.patch | text/x-diff | 6.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2015-08-03 02:20:12 | Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-08-03 01:56:53 | Re: Explanation for intermittent buildfarm pg_upgradecheck failures |