Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2016-03-23 00:52:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRLO7+nHfX9sd15jamRyW6kp+2x096ObT9yXV7N=ecdcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:38 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 3/15/16 10:01 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>
>> Ok, I understand that this is not an issue in a hurry. I'll go to
>> another patch that needs review.
>
> Since we're getting towards the end of the CF is it time to pick this up
> again?

Perhaps not. This is a legit bug with an unfinished patch (see index
relation truncation) that is going to need a careful review. I don't
think that this should be impacted by the 4/8 feature freeze, so we
could still work on that after the embargo and we've had this bug for
months actually. FWIW, I am still planning to work on it once the CF
is done, in order to keep my manpower focused on actual patch reviews
as much as possible...
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-23 00:54:40 Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-03-23 00:52:23 Re: problem with precendence order in JSONB merge operator