| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2017-11-29 01:37:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRLHnNkvaP4G_uVXYc3O4S2PVhvXSmS9uVSGL0SL_DXYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Rebased version of the patches attached
The status of the patch is misleading:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/844/. This was marked as waiting
on author but a new version has been published. Let's be careful.
The last patches I am aware of, aka those from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGTBQpZHTf2JtShC=ijc9wzEipo3XOKWQhx+8WiP7ZjPC3FBEg@mail.gmail.com,
do not apply. I am moving the patch to the next commit fest with a
waiting on author status, as this should be reviewed, but those need a
rebase.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-29 01:41:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-11-29 01:24:08 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |