| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 01:01:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRF5Lbk5fkDD5FX0i5_LkP=ZoPrqQ_0rgKVeWRrcbW3BQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> pg_advance_replication_slot(...)
>
> ERROR's on logical slot, for now. Physical slots only.
>
> Forward-only.
>
> Future work to allow it to use the logical decoding infrastructure to
> fast-forward a slot by reading only catalog change information and
> invalidations, either via a dummy output plugin that filters out all xacts,
> or by lower level use of the decoding code.
>
> Reasonable?
Yes. I did not imply logical slots in my previous message, sorry if my
words were incomplete.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-08-17 01:09:26 | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-17 00:45:42 | Re: Fix number skipping in to_number |