| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
| Date: | 2016-09-09 01:28:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRDvJn18e54ccNpOP1A2_iUN6-iU=4nJgmMgiAgvcSDKA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
> after introduced quorum.
> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.
Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does
not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be
GA soon.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-09-09 01:43:26 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-09 01:23:45 | Re: Install extensions using update scripts (was Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple) |