| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
| Date: | 2016-09-09 06:23:06 |
| Message-ID: | 0c8315dc-c6ca-de82-a1d3-88d816a29b45@2ndquadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/09/2016 03:28 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
>> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
>> after introduced quorum.
>> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
>> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.
>
> Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does
> not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be
> GA soon.
Indeed. I'll vote for pulling a fast one on 9.6 for this.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Михаил Бахтерев | 2016-09-09 06:41:40 | Re: GiST penalty functions [PoC] |
| Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2016-09-09 05:50:59 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |