Re: sequence data type

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sequence data type
Date: 2017-03-30 03:31:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR80VFSX_h-wwet9pxzxNRydt3N-ZMKcu9ZnGx4aeQZTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Vitaly Burovoy
<vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think min_value and max_value should not be set to "1" or "-1" but
> to real min/max of the type by default.

This is the default behavior for ages, since e8647c45 to be exact. So
you would change 20 years of history?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-30 03:34:01 Re: Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message Rafia Sabih 2017-03-30 03:23:16 Re: TPC-H Q20 from 1 hour to 19 hours!