| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
| Date: | 2015-12-09 23:03:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR4wCveRri8utwut5y1dqT7Q5KrZwEO0YjQ+6wGHsYrOg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> Agreed that the "whole new language" aspect seems like way too big a
>> hammer, given what it actually does.
>
> Which would be easier to update when things change?
Regarding that both patches are equal compared to the current methods
with strcmp.
> Which would be possible to automatically generate from gram.y?
None of those patches take this approach.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-09 23:04:21 | Re: Given a view relation OID, how to construct a Query? |
| Previous Message | Eric Ridge | 2015-12-09 22:35:40 | Given a view relation OID, how to construct a Query? |