Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Simple patch, applies and makes cleanly, does what it says and says what it does.
>
> If a transaction holding locks aborts on an otherwise idle server, perhaps it will take a very long time for a log-shipping standby to realize this. But I have hard time believing that anyone who cares about that would be using log-shipping (rather than streaming) anyway.
>
> Marking it ready for committer.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Thanks! That was deadly fast.

Just wondering: shouldn't we keep the discussion around this patch on
-bugs instead? Not saying you are wrong, Jeff, I am just not sure what
would be the best practice regarding patches related to bugs. I would
think that it is at least necessary to keep the person who reported
the bug in CC to let him know the progress though.
--
Michael