Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Date: 2017-02-25 14:00:11
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQw44DovpoZkZghmJA42h3Z1oz-YfR0tbSOVihkAwFShw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Oh, I definitely think such a command should be able to take a placeholder
> like %f telling which segment it has just processed. In fact, I'd consider
> it one of the most important features of it :)

I cannot think about any other meaningful variables, do you?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-02-25 14:12:42 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-25 13:58:32 Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API