Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date: 2017-11-30 03:35:06
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQvbMc5Exx=Qfx=42Osntqrm-thLLt3wCiLvLaokcsg4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
>> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> This is a rebased version of the patch.
>>
>> As far as I can see, the patch still applies, compiles, and got no
>> reviews. So moved to next CF.
>
> I think we have to mark this as returned with feedback or rejected for
> the reasons mentioned here:
>
> http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZjn28uYJRQ2K+5idhYxWBDER68sctoc2p_nW7h7JbhYw@mail.gmail.com

Good point. I forgot this bit. Thanks for mentioning it I am switching
the patch as returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:37:59 Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:33:01 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range of object drops.