| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
| Date: | 2017-02-27 05:43:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQvYMNfrKKjXz37cADTXJf+fDLGTURTFWKcJ6Zi1757YQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Hi all,
I bumped into a case where it would have been rather useful to specify
a service file path in a connection string with a service name. In my
case, I have finished by setting up PGSERVICEFILE, but now like
PGPASSFILE I think that being able to define the service file
available as well as a connection parameter would be useful as well.
I am not planning to work on that immediately (there is one day left
for the last CF of PG10!), but I was wondering if people would be
interested in something like that.
So, opinions?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-27 05:47:28 | Creation of "Future" commit fest, named 2017-07 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-27 05:32:00 | Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-02-27 06:03:40 | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter |
| Previous Message | Jacques Fuentes | 2017-02-23 17:58:03 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] bd0497: Make replication docs use PREFER_QUERY_MODE (#761) |