Re: [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs(at)apache(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64
Date: 2017-03-10 01:29:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQuEVbCT7XnMqexjqm3P2ThHk2gGrxRNmwJ_8ipKUdnCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs(at)apache(dot)org> wrote:
>> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
>> the Greenplum code base over here:
>> https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/1983

+1.

> Thanks. Please add this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/ so
> it doesn't get forgotten. I'm afraid your patch is probably too late
> for v10 (the deadline for patches to be considered for v10 was March
> 1st, though somebody might propose to make an exception), but v11 will
> be here soon enough.

Yeah, one month earlier would have been fine though. This is not
really invasive.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-03-10 01:47:01 Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-10 01:26:22 Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables