Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.
Date: 2017-02-01 05:23:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQr93i2jQnQVKjmqf73aMqO9Hy6R3gACYN8SogmOxrAwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> HashMetaPage _hash_getcachedmetap(Relation rel, Buffer *metabuf, bool
>> force_refresh);
>>
>> If the cache is initialized and force_refresh is not true, then this
>> just returns the cached data, and the metabuf argument isn't used.
>> Otherwise, if *metabuf == InvalidBuffer, we set *metabuf to point to
>> the metabuffer, pin and lock it, use it to set the cache, release the
>> lock, and return with the pin still held. If *metabuf !=
>> InvalidBuffer, we assume it's pinned and return with it still pinned.
>
> Thanks, Robert I have made a new patch which tries to do same. Now I
> think code looks less complicated.

Moved to CF 2017-03.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-02-01 05:42:11 Re: proposal: session server side variables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 05:22:22 Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem