Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-06-24 22:19:40
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQqwK=hHppUvKe1Kwbd6ne2C+R9Kceb55fmqRw__NmUXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-06-24 09:57:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> > Otherwise I think there's not really much left to be done. Fujii?
>>
>> Well, other than the fact that we've not got MVCC catalog scans yet.
>
> That statement was only about about the patch dealing the removal of
> reltoastidxid.
Partially my mistake. It is not that obvious just based on the name of
this thread, so I should have moved the review of this particular
patch to another thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2013-06-24 22:20:59 Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-24 22:18:26 Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS