Re: postgresql-9.5alpha1 packaging

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql-9.5alpha1 packaging
Date: 2015-07-04 11:25:59
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQqF2iQzEqW_OsUM9DWqtUDzkYcO+mxEWQnNdXT1zQf_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As there are additional or moved binaries in comparison to 9.4
>
> -usr/bin/pg_archivecleanup.exe
> -usr/bin/pg_rewind.exe
> -usr/bin/pg_test_fsync.exe
> -usr/bin/pg_test_timing.exe
> -usr/bin/pg_upgrade.exe
> -usr/bin/pg_xlogdump.exe
> -usr/bin/pgbench.exe

pgbench should be put on the client-side as it is a benchmark tool,
and the rest on the server-side as they serve directly the backend.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-04 11:45:19 Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
Previous Message chenhj 2015-07-04 11:03:07 Re: PATCH:do not set Win32 server-side socket buffer size on windows 2012