Re: September 2015 Commitfest

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Date: 2015-10-30 23:42:54
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQnntOh-n1=jBjO4p_pH7o8KcEWw_gaMCg6Y+7WcBzBQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
>>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
>>>> entries first?
>>>
>>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the
>>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real
>>> review.
>>
>> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the
>> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with
>> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because
>> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove
>> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed:
>> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.

So, seeing nothing happening I have done the above, opened 2015-11 CF
and closed the current one.

> Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-(

Yep.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-10-30 23:55:20 Re: September 2015 Commitfest
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-30 23:16:31 Re: ALTER ... OWNER TO ... vs. ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES