From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |
Date: | 2015-10-30 23:42:54 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQnntOh-n1=jBjO4p_pH7o8KcEWw_gaMCg6Y+7WcBzBQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
>>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
>>>> entries first?
>>>
>>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the
>>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real
>>> review.
>>
>> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the
>> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with
>> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because
>> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove
>> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed:
>> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.
So, seeing nothing happening I have done the above, opened 2015-11 CF
and closed the current one.
> Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-(
Yep.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-10-30 23:55:20 | Re: September 2015 Commitfest |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-30 23:16:31 | Re: ALTER ... OWNER TO ... vs. ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES |