Re: Confusing docs about GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing docs about GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml
Date: 2016-10-02 14:03:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQhOGxiZXr-Ub7YjXBvRuGi7r1VuuhJSgc-dWDP8uUw4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Rushabh Lathia
<rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I performed basic test with patch,
>
> a) patch get applied cleanly on latest source,
> b) able to build documentation cleanly.
>
> Marking this as ready for committer.

Oops, incorrect patch... I am moving it to next CF. Discussion can
continue there.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-10-02 14:06:37 Re: pg_upgade vs config
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-02 14:01:43 Re: Minor improvement to fdwhandler.sgml