Re: Regarding recovery configuration

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding recovery configuration
Date: 2015-12-01 11:58:49
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQgSVfRWkqTn_NdR7LsCe=rki6ronQiW_8Bbnna3zQCwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> 2. Add them to the GUC, perhaps with a special context.
>
> Both approaches would allow us to create, for example, a dedicated view for
> the 'recovery.conf' file using a drastically simplified procedure written in C.
> Also it would get easier to reload at least some settings from the
> 'recovery.conf' file at runtime.
>
> Suggestions and comments are welcome.

Beginning here may be a good idea, this is not a new subject:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJKUy5id1eyweK0W4+yyCM6+-qYs9erLidUmb=1a-QYBgTW4Qw@mail.gmail.com

And that's something a couple of people have tried to work on without
much progress over the last couple of years: we blocked on a couple of
points like for example the way we should manage the switch to what is
now done from recovery.conf to recovery.done.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-12-01 12:21:19 Re: parallel joins, and better parallel explain
Previous Message Dmitry Ivanov 2015-12-01 11:46:51 Regarding recovery configuration