Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
Date: 2017-11-28 00:48:57
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQdNSwrd3rS99xXU4ze2mANMD7aHqzJGmuy1Ai0-TkLow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> Perhaps I'm the one who is misunderstanding. If you propose a patch I'll be
> happy to review it, though I doubt there is a lot to be gained even if it
> would be a better implementation.

OK. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for the input.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-11-28 00:59:01 Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-28 00:47:45 Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows