On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> In any case, we are going to need at least (void) in front of those calls.
>
> We're "needing" nothing of the sort.
I don't really understand your reluctance here. As one example, see
c831593 where similar fixes are done and even back-patched.
--
Michael