Re: Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com
Subject: Re: Use of RangeVar for partitioned tables in autovacuum
Date: 2017-09-28 05:17:38
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQaGC9sGnZ4q-meeR4FXeB_P44--P9G9E5faYz_dEz+jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no
> objections.

And done. Moved to the non-bug section.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-28 05:20:34 Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-09-28 04:58:33 Re: path toward faster partition pruning