Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.
Date: 2017-09-07 01:28:57
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQYg+ZAjTjfR_zaZhDfztnQ5kBu6sAG3hA4bYDxBeWFnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/4/17 06:03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
>>>> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
>>>> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
>>>> messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
>>>
>>> Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
>>> is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed
>>> this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
>>
>> Actually this code goes throgh vsnprintf, not fprintf, which should be
>> safe, so I removed that part of the comment, and pushed.
>
> Is there a reason this was not backpatched to 9.5?

Indeed. Please note that cherry-picking the fix from 23c1f0a works just fine.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-07 02:37:02 Re: pgsql: Remove endof macro
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-07 01:11:51 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-07 01:37:10 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-07 01:11:51 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.