Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date: 2016-10-03 02:17:35
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQVUsg8fxopPW7OcXjBnR==HOWhXVaM3QtGnYcpwFoW2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree, but we need to cope with above two problems.

I have marked the patch as returned with feedback per the last output
Ashutosh has provided.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 02:18:44 Re: patch: function xmltable
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 02:15:04 Re: Stopping logical replication protocol