On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think it's fine. Good error messages are a useful thing.
>
> More generally, I think the whole patch looks good and should be committed.
Hm. I'd think that it is still more portable to just issue a WARNING
message in palloc_extended() when MCXT_ALLOC_NO_OOM then. Other code
paths could benefit from that as well, and the patch proposed does
nothing for the other places calling it. I am fine to write a patch
for this purpose if you agree on that.
--
Michael