Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)
Date: 2017-03-23 11:29:10
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQN9YWHWaNCc2Wf1g0RuMuFtROKPx2DDYgCZ0jCAprReA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hence, to be consistent with others, bgworker processes can be
> initialized from BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionBy[Oid].

Yeah, I am fine with that. Thanks for the updated versions.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2017-03-23 11:33:53 GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errors handling
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-03-23 11:19:23 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)