Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date: 2017-04-03 22:28:47
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQKUoV6Vce4Ba9OTf8KA7n96rPM_EOD665hGHmaGFerDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm very curious what you're thinking here? IIRC, Andrew had some ideas
> for how to do true cross-version testing with TAP in the buildfarm, but
> I don't think we actually have that yet..?

I heard about nothing in this area. Cross-branch tests may be an
interesting challenge as tests written in branch X may not be in Y.
The patch presented here does lower the coverage we have now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-03 22:34:15 Re: Candidate for local inline function?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-04-03 22:19:39 Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion