Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date: 2016-07-27 00:01:57
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQGwCFHin5aTY6FVEHOKW_LvHQi2LJAd0=7RmoHiSZJnw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Does any body else see the use case
> reported by Chapman important enough that we try to have some solution
> for it in-core?

The lack of updates in the pg_lesslog project is a sign that it is not
that much used. I does not seem a good idea to bring in-core a tool
not used that much by users.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2016-07-27 00:20:32 Re: AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-07-26 23:46:25 Re: Proposal: revert behavior of IS NULL on row types