| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2017-11-29 05:25:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQGKeXrxGmKcRyZbthV_4oC8jO9VA0UrDDPbhDp3W4U4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok. Removed the documentation changes that it cannot be used for normal
> scenarios, and also added a Note section explaining the problem of using
> the dump with pg_restore command with --clean and --create options.
Hari, the documentation portion of the patch does not apply. Could you
rebase? For now I am moving it to next CF as this did not get any
reviews, and the status is switched to "waiting on author".
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-29 05:26:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-29 05:17:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed |