Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2016-09-06 09:03:53
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQG6MarwDdYFAmpL52=8eVQ208He=OK4HzMjBh9+W-E-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> On 06 Sep 2016, at 04:41, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This overlaps with TwoPhaseGetGXact but I'd rather keep both things
>> separated: it does not seem worth complicating the existing interface,
>> and putting that in cache during recovery has no meaning.
>
> Oh, I was preparing new version of patch, after fresh look on it. Probably, I should
> said that in this topic. I’ve found a bug in sub transaction handling and now working
> on fix.

What's the problem actually?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-09-06 09:09:37 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-09-06 09:01:58 Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013