| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages |
| Date: | 2016-04-07 00:26:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQEKGOsH6GCuDR2N-D3j3jMvAnyBZGXS8wBfUwg9fJQFw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-06 16:49:17 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Perhaps easy to solve, but how do we test it is solved?
>
> Maybe something like
>
> -- drain
> pg_logical_slot_get_changes(...);
> -- generate message in different database, to ensure it's not processed
> -- in this database
> \c template1
> SELECT pg_logical_emit_message(...);
> \c postgres
> -- check
> pg_logical_slot_get_changes(..);
>
> It's a bit ugly to hardcode database names :/
When running installcheck, there is no way to be sure that databases
template1 and/or postgres exist on a server, so this test would fail
because of that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-04-07 00:51:34 | Re: postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidating prepare statement execution plan. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-06 23:20:57 | Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support |