Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Haroon (dot)" <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haroon <muhammad(dot)haroon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date: 2016-07-01 01:02:25
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQCv24xbD-Fq8pj_R9WdfN=xHHys5KU7sNV7=TgV6NqrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 30 June 2016 at 20:19, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm, so what about a pure 32bit build, if such a thing still exists? If
>> > so and it causes the same crash, perhaps we should have one member for
>> > each VS version running on 32bit x86.
>>
>> It's fine for a pure 32-bit build, i.e. 32-bit tools and 32-bit target. I
>> tested that.
>
> Ah, okay. I doubt it's worth setting up buildfarm members testing all
> cross-compiles just to try and catch possible compiler bugs that way, so
> unless somebody wants to invest more effort in this area, it seems we're
> done here.

Sure. To be honest just using the latest version of MSVC available for
the builds is fine I think. Windows is very careful regarding
backward-compatibility of its compiled stuff usually, even if by using
VS2015 you make the builds of Postgres incompatible with XP. But
software is a world that keeps moving on, and XP is already out of
support by Redmond.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-07-01 01:14:15 Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-01 00:58:08 Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions?