Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Date: 2015-02-13 13:07:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQAznaP5vD0Efe7tQZSgWch_StjWZvQFB9WExab+SgJPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
> wrote:
> > Do you also think the SQL functions should be named numeric_int128_sum,
> > numeric_int128_avg, etc?
>
> Some quick review comments. These apply to int128-agg-v5.patch.
>

Andreas, are you planning to continue working on this patch? Peter has
provided some comments that are still unanswered.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-02-13 13:26:14 Refactoring GUC unit conversions
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2015-02-13 13:04:59 Re: Logical Replication Helpers WIP for discussion