Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amborodin(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Sergey Mirvoda <sergey(at)mirvoda(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]
Date: 2016-07-24 12:18:45
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ8KpphNL6jS8whjLMODgsoCa1t6CD7mCsSG43O_WrgPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Andrew Borodin <borodin(at)octonica(dot)com> wrote:
>>If a feature changes the shape of WAL records, XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC is bumped to prevent any problems.
>
> I've attached patch with a bump, but, obviously, it'll be irrelevant
> after any other commit changing WAL shape.

Usually the committer in charge of reviewing such a patch would bump
it. There is no need for the patch submitter to do so. I should have
been more precise previously, sorry for my twisted words.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2016-07-24 13:12:51 Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values
Previous Message Andrew Borodin 2016-07-24 10:18:20 Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC]