Re: WIP: Access method extendability

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date: 2016-02-29 11:54:07
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ2nvH647D-R1r7qTwjnjAqVySfoqzVmGimM1d8DbWOWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> This is basically a copy of RewindTest.pm. This is far from generic.
>> If this patch gets committed first I would suggest to wait for the
>> more-generic routines that would be added in PostgresNode.pm and then
>> come back to it.
>
>
> Yes, that's it. Now, with committed changes to PostgresNode.pm, I get rid of
> separate WALTest.pm.

The test is cleaner in this shape, thanks.

+ # Run few queries on both master and stanbdy and check their results match.
s/stanbdy/standby
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-02-29 12:07:09 Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-02-29 11:48:25 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics